ALTERNATE DESTINIES ZELDA CHAPTER 2 SERIES

Admittedly, it helps that 2D Mario games typically sell tens of millions of units (the original New Super Mario Bros. Even after stellar 3D entries like Super Mario Galaxy and Super Mario Odyssey, Mario’s ventures in 2D have remained active and healthy, with the most recent entry Super Mario Bros.

ALTERNATE DESTINIES ZELDA CHAPTER 2 SERIES

Remember when Super Mario 64 launched in 1996, bringing the series into 3D, and its success prompted Nintendo to give up making 2D Mario games because they didn’t offer enough freedom? No, you don’t. Multitasking Mario Don’t expect 2D Mario to ever die. So, why not just do both? Why not alternate between the two styles of gameplay so fans of both stay happy? It’s a practice easier said than done, but Nintendo has already demonstrated it’s able and willing to try this with one of its other flagship franchises: Super Mario.

There’s no reason for Zelda to abandon its current formula, but likewise there’s no reason for the series to completely abandon the original formula either. A Link Between Worlds was arguably a testing ground for Breath of the Wild by allowing you to attempt the temples in any order. In fact, those two examples I mentioned above are some of the least linear Zelda games out there. Sure, there’s not as much freedom as the newer ones, but there were still copious side activities to attempt in between the main goals. Besides, the older games weren’t entirely linear either. Sure, that plays a part of it, but it’s not as if all the previous games have aged poorly I’d happily recommend newer fans check out titles such as Majora’s Mask and A Link Between Worlds if only because they’re fun to play. It’s ultimately a matter of preference, yet Aonuma’s comments to IGN about some players having a “grass is greener” mentality suggests their demands are colored by nostalgia. Previous entries like The Wind Waker featured open-world environments too. Sometimes, it’s preferable to embark on a journey that’s mostly from A to B without fear of being pulled in a million directions. I’m very much in the camp of people who dislike the breakable weapons, while the plots of both games are rather minimalist and mostly told through flashbacks, and for as much as I praise the open-world sandbox of current Hyrule, it can be overwhelming.

Most people love modern Zelda, and Nintendo has no reason to reverse course.Įven as someone who thinks Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom are masterpieces, though, there are aspects of the older games I miss and aspects of the newer ones I don’t care for. Tears of the Kingdom may have lost the same trophy to Baldur’s Gate 3 at this year’s show, but it still saw multiple nominations and took home the award for Best Action/Adventure Game. Breath of the Wild won no less than 25 awards, including Game of the Year at The Game Awards 2017. Go back and look at those sales numbers, not to mention the accolades. Let’s not mince words: The open-world formula is here to stay. Aonuma seems to think there’s no reason to (although it’s argued his comments about linear games being a thing of the past were taken out of context), but why is everyone acting like Zelda needs to be one thing or the other when the series could simply travel down both paths? Open-world Hyrule is not going away There’s a decent number of fans who simply don’t enjoy the more open-ended structure or sandbox style of modern Zelda who feel something has been lost in the shift and that the series needs to return to its roots.

In video games, surely more freedom and less restraint can only be a good thing, right? Well, not to everyone. Some of the most critically acclaimed entries in the series were fairly linear.

Alternate destinies zelda chapter 2